Our Editorial Team

Maya Ellison guides the overall direction of OnlineMBTITest and is responsible for the consistency and tone of everything we publish. She sets the editorial standards the rest of the team follows, plans which pages to write or refresh next, and gives every draft a final read before it goes live. Maya pays close attention to fairness, making sure no type is described in flattering or unflattering extremes and that each profile reads as a balanced portrait rather than a verdict. She enjoys turning dense theory into clear, welcoming language that a first-time reader can follow without prior background. Much of her week is spent reviewing edits, resolving questions raised by the writers, and deciding when an older page needs to be reworked. Maya believes good personality writing should leave readers feeling understood and curious, never labeled.

Daniel Okafor writes the heart of the site: the individual type profiles and the relationship and compatibility guides. He drafts the long-form descriptions of how each type tends to think, work, and connect with others, then refines them through several passes until the language feels natural and specific. Daniel is careful to frame traits as tendencies rather than fixed rules, and he weaves in everyday examples so that abstract descriptions become recognizable. He spends a lot of time considering how different types interact, aiming for guides that feel encouraging and realistic rather than prescriptive about who belongs with whom. When readers send questions or point out a description that does not ring true, Daniel often revisits the page to sharpen it. He likes writing that respects the reader's own judgment and invites reflection instead of handing down conclusions.

Sofia Marchetti looks after accuracy and keeps our content honest. She fact-checks the claims in our profiles, traces statements back to reputable sources on personality theory, and flags anything that reads as overstated or unsupported. Sofia compares how the sixteen types are described across the wider literature so our pages stay consistent with established frameworks while remaining easy to read. She is the team's quiet skeptic, asking whether a sentence is genuinely supported or simply sounds appealing, and she trims claims that promise more certainty than the subject allows. A large part of her work is maintenance: reviewing older articles, noting where wording has drifted or aged, and scheduling updates so the site does not grow stale. Sofia believes readers deserve content they can trust, written with care and revised whenever it can be made more accurate.